Vaginal reconstruction is an appealing term that often promises benefits such as vaginal tightening, improved natural lubrication, and even stronger orgasms. But do laser or radiofrequency devices truly deliver these results? And do we really need these treatments?

In many beauty centers and clinics, you can pay around $3,000 for services like vaginal laser therapy, platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections, or vaginal steaming. These treatments claim to address issues like urinary leakage, vaginal dryness, and reduced sexual sensation. But is this actually true?

What is Vaginal Reconstruction?

The term “vaginal reconstruction” is essentially a marketing term and has no specific medical definition. These treatments usually involve non-invasive energy-based devices that use laser or radiofrequency for “vaginal rejuvenation.”

According to research, the global vaginal reconstruction market was valued at approximately $3.57 billion in 2023 and is projected to grow at a rate of 22% by 2030.

“Vaginal reconstruction is not a medical term; it is a marketing term.”
— Lauren Streicher, MD, Clinical Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University

Women’s sexual health and feelings also play a role in the popularity of these treatments. Nearly 40% of American women experience sexual problems, such as dryness, pain during intercourse, or changes in sexual pleasure.

Do Vaginal Reconstruction Devices Really Work?

One study provides clear evidence: researchers at the University of New South Wales, Australia, in 2021, examined the effect of CO2 vaginal laser compared to a placebo (sham) treatment.

The results showed that after 12 months, there was no significant difference between the laser group and the sham group. Side effects such as pain and spotting were reported in both groups.

These findings suggest that simply consulting a gynecologist and discussing sexual issues can sometimes improve symptoms on its own.

“Misleading advertising for these methods without scientific evidence is dangerous, and MarryClubVIP’s website assumes no responsibility in this regard.”

Vaginal reconstruction remains a controversial field. Reported complications include vaginal burns, scarring, pain during intercourse, and chronic pain.

Reputable organizations such as ACOG and the North American Menopause Society have also warned against using these devices and recommend limiting their use until sufficient clinical evidence is available.

Nevertheless, these treatments are still offered in many clinics due to their lucrative market.

Read More Article:

One Glass of Milk a Day May Lower Colorectal Cancer Risk

How Did These Devices Enter the Market?

CO2 and Erbium YAG lasers were initially approved for skin issues such as acne, wrinkles, and tattoos. Later, some companies repurposed these devices for vaginal reconstruction — without sufficient evidence for improving orgasm or sexual function.

Despite extensive advertising, scientific evidence supporting the effectiveness and safety of these treatments is limited. The best approach for women is consulting a gynecologist and discussing sexual health and vaginal care.

Energy-Based Treatments and Sexual Function (According to PubMed Sources)

• CO2 Fractional Laser: Studies have shown that this treatment can help reduce vaginal laxity and improve symptoms related to genitourinary syndrome of menopause. In one study, 66% of patients reported improvement in vaginal tightness, and 63% reported improvement in sexual activity quality.

• Radiofrequency: Radiofrequency treatment has also been effective in improving vaginal laxity and menopausal symptoms. However, comparative studies show no significant difference between radiofrequency and topical hormonal treatments in improving sexual function.

• Vaginoplasty: Studies have shown that this surgical procedure can improve sexual function. In one study, FSFI (Female Sexual Function Index) scores increased significantly after surgery.

Concerns and Limitations

Despite some positive results, there are concerns regarding the long-term safety and effectiveness of these treatments:

• FDA Warning: In 2018, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warned that energy-based devices may cause burns, scarring, and chronic pain, and their effectiveness in treating vaginal symptoms is unproven.

• Lack of Long-Term Data: Long-term, controlled studies on the safety and efficacy of these treatments are limited.

Conclusion

While energy-based treatments can improve certain vaginal symptoms, their impact on sexual function is complex and requires further investigation. Before deciding on these treatments, consulting a specialist and considering alternative options such as pelvic floor exercises (Kegel) and hormonal therapies is recommended.

Source: Allure, PubMed